an infinite duality

Most, if not all the writings in this small corner of the inter webs extoll the concepts of “no others” and “not-two”. There are, quite literally, an infinite ways on which to describe reality. This is yet another angle, not unlike all the other angles. It would be fruitless to describe the entirety of “things” without having to recreate the “things” in which would need a description, as cryptic as that may sound.

Below is an example of both words and a visual description in basic terms, however it would assume all things being equal, which they are indeed not.

So, what does this really say? It says that the only true duality is one that involves only the observer and the observed and that is what the basis of all things are, in both detailed and fuzzy logic.

To assume that there are specific stuff that are particles, waves, or any other descriptions is a fruitless process. We continually assume we can do stuff about any narrative. But as we know, grand impactful change absolutely requires conformity of many, even if those many are only in a moment, united. It’s an illusion that time is a thing and that it exists in states beyond the always now. Even if that sounds pedantic, even when you feel some sort of distrust in the being of being, it’s always the case that there is no multiples of anything, anywhere at anytime.