an explaining zero (this experience, without math)

If you’ve read much of my rambling, you might have figured I’m not a big proponent of math as an answer to much outside of measure. While I understand math as a tool, the majority of it is just (to me) an exercise in thought function. I won’t go on about this, just know that is hill I’d die on.

To understand zero, we can look to the wave over a course of time. Simply put, if there was a rate theory of time passage and it move like a wave, any other wave that wasn’t in a certain measurable rate would not only collapse instantly, it wouldn’t propagate are all. Given this general concept, zero is equal to ∞. A rate without measure, a movement that doesn’t step up or down, increase or decrease, modulate in any manner.

There is truly only one other deal to that sort of logic, this infinites inverse, the finite rate of 1. No matter what object we are talking about, its existence depends on its rate of somewhere between these 2 ineffable vectors. This is the experience of time, from any perspective, in object permanence and also in function.

This is how we can “make up” distance by any measure, using any unit of consistency. The second could easily be anything other than what we describe it to be. A mile or a kilometer are irrelevant as a standard of measure so long as they remain consistent to the measuring perspective. Measure anything using a stick, a brick, a horse, etc..

Existence is, indeed adichotomy, a duality, a paradoxical inferred perception.

And now you understand zero.