I’ve intersected the feedback of “An eternal paradox” with what one would imbue as internal intuition. So with that let’s take a walk through reality. You can close your eyes and read forward, with eyes wide open, because the future you wouldn’t have changed at all, regardless of what your reading this would manifest. All of existence is, quite certainly, an eternal paradox and we don’t get to remove ourselves to examine it as such. A fish might tell you that it’s all water and this other stuff and us a humans would point to the fish and extoll, “ha! you have no idea”. The general concept being, we cannot conceptualize our reality as we only perceive the stuff as is, yet neither of us (the human nor the fish) are required to know anymore that “this”, this all eternally.
I mentioned about our number system and how it’s extraneously redundant. I proposed that we could and do, in fact describe all “things” (including things we wouldn’t typically associate as “things”) with 2 digits 0 and 1 (a duality, if you will), which includes our humanly redundant number system. A while this isn’t any new concept, the only actually correct response should be “of course”. As of 400 year BC or there about, Laozi explained that; what is cannot actually be explained as part of Tao Te Ching and in typical progress/regress fashion, modern technology simply reaffirms that this is indeed so by utilizing the natural order of the universe, the binary, the duality of the entirety of existence.
Nonduality further pursues this general concept by inviting that although experience (all stuff and concepts through any function of senses) can be described as dual, it also must literally and ultimately be describe as not-two since they cannot actually be separated. Ergo, duality has to rise and fall together, else there would never be anything in which to be experienced. All explanations of the thing, are in fact incomplete and could never actually describe all things without this, duality.
I understand, it’s elusive and individually prescribed narratives (science, religion, theologies, etc.) truly believe we independently persist, therefore all things must, simply must, be independent. I think therefore i am… However, that is the nature of ego, an attempt to split a truth from a fallacy in order to inspire and create new and improved things.
This is the how/why/what/where propels us, the very natural order of the universe, of which we are (the royal we) are already and always, inseparable from.